Posts Tagged ‘sarah palin’


Sunday, April 17th, 2011

Some people with similar political views and a similar sense of humor to me say that they would love to have Sarah Palin run for President, as it would be hilarious and would be an unsuccessful campaign. As far as I can recall, I’ve never bought in to this for a couple of reasons: the prospect is too scary to begin with and I am still hoping for some sort of legitimate intellectual conservatism to emerge.

I’m not sure I really have as much restraint in the face of Donald Trump. He’s just such a great caricature of the tea party that I can’t help but watch. When talking about how he was a better businessman (and therefore more qualified candidate) than Mitt Romney, he recently said: “[I have a] much, much bigger net worth. I mean my net worth is many, many, many times Mitt Romney.” I seriously can’t wait for this year’s Republican primaries.

An Essential Role

Monday, January 18th, 2010

I watched (er, listened to) Glenn Beck’s hour-long interview with Sarah Palin. I’ll save you the time and tell you that it’s almost entirely uninteresting, but there were a couple of things worthy of comment. First, for laughs, my favorite part of the exchange was:

Beck: Who’s your favorite founding father?
Palin: All of them.

The other thing that struck me was her statement that “God played an essential role in the founding of this nation.” Couldn’t the same be said about any other nation? Actually, wouldn’t she say the same thing about literally everything? On a less pedantic note, statements like this attribute God’s favor on certain geopolitical entities. I don’t attribute this to malice on the part of the speaker, but I find it quite discomforting because it sounds too much like something a king or other leader would say to rally people into a war or crusade. Are we really less happy if we’re not “God’s Favorite Country”?

Lie of the Year

Monday, December 21st, 2009

The Saint Petersburg Times’ picked its Lie of the Year, and the distinction goes to retired government employee Sarah Palin, for “death panels”:

Her assertion — that the government would set up boards to determine whether seniors and the disabled were worthy of care — spread through newscasts, talk shows, blogs and town hall meetings. Opponents of health care legislation said it revealed the real goals of the Democratic proposals. Advocates for health reform said it showed the depths to which their opponents would sink. Still others scratched their heads and said, “Death panels? Really?”

I can’t think of a more influential but demonstrably false statement from this year, can you?


Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

The quality of a news outlet is inversely proportional to the amount of time it spent “covering” David Letterman/Sarah Palin over the weekend.

Excited about Palin 2012?

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

you may now start donating.

From The Onion’s year in review…

Sunday, December 21st, 2008

Area Woman Becomes Republican Vice Presidential Candidate

It’s a pretty good interpretation of the caricature.

Some thanks

Monday, November 24th, 2008

“Our country deserves better”


Friday, November 14th, 2008

From CNN:

Asked why she chose to hold her first formal news conference now, she replied, “The campaign is over.”

Well, I guess she’s right…

Palin post-election

Monday, November 10th, 2008

Now that the election has passed, there are a lot of things anonymously leaking from McCain campaign staffers about Sarah Palin. Fox News had some of the leaks here:

These anonymous post-loss leaks are somewhat silly, since you don’t know who they’re coming from and if they have an ax to grind. I don’t think that Sarah Palin literally didn’t know that Africa was a continent, but I don’t really care. What I do believe, however, is that campaign staff were legitimately concerned the she did not have the “knowledgeability” to be McCain’s running mate and a heartbeat from the presidency. I believe that part because it’s not news at all, most people watching her came to the same conclusion. It takes a certain kind of cynicism to work to elect someone you think is unqualified, though. As I said before, some of this is certainly sour grapes, but I don’t remember seeing this much after the Kerry, Gore and Dole campaigns (do you? maybe I missed it).

This reminds me a bit of Scott McClellan’s book: nothing he was saying was surprising to me (and a lot of other people), but it’s just another data point of confirmation. If they were claiming something much more divergent than what we already knew, it’d be more suspect.

To be honest, I was looking forward to not writing about Sarah Palin anymore. They lost, and there’s no need to pile on. Here’s what made me change my mind:

“a new national poll said 64 percent of Republicans consider her their top choice to run for president in 2012″ (Anchorage Daily News)

Paul Begala (Democratic strategist and commentator) brought up a similar statistic on Bill Maher’s show and appended “and 100% of Democrats want her back, too!”. If my goal were to elect Democrats, I’d agree, but it’s not, so I couldn’t disagree more. I really don’t want Sarah Palin to be the future of the Republican Party. I think it’d be bad for the GOP and, in turn, bad for the country. I want a real, intellectual, moderate conservative movement in the US, and I think she’s the opposite of the type of person who should bring it.

The UPDATE section below turned out to be based upon a fraudulent blog post (thanks to Brendan for catching it). The blog linking to it published a retraction and deleted a post soon after linking, but I didn’t see the retraction later. I’m leaving it in just to give coherence to the subsequent comments.

I wrote half of this post last night and finished it today, and in the meantime the anonymous person leaking the stories about Palin announced who he was. I’m too lazy to rewrite the post, so I’ll just keep going. The leaker was one of McCain’s foreign policy advisors, Marty Eisenstadt. He writes:

[…] in the context of [debate] prep, it slowly became apparent that her grasp of basic geo-political knowledge had major gaps. Could she have passed a multiple choice test about South Africa or NAFTA. Probably. But it was clear that she simply didn’t have the ease of knowledge that we come to expect from a major party political candidate. Other slights came up, too: Not knowing the difference between Hezbollah and Hamas. Or the difference between the Shiites and Suni. Or when it came to international terrorist organizations, knowing that the IRA was in Northern Ireland, and ETA in Spain.

This sounds entirely plausible to me, especially with a named source to back it up. These types of things aren’t just trivia questions, they’re a clear indicator of her total disinterest in foreign policy. McCain’s choice of a VP, the clearest demonstration of his judgement we saw in the campaign, was absolutely reckless and failed to put country first.

The McCain/Palin Debate

Monday, November 3rd, 2008

This remixed video is rather amusing, though the background music is really annoying: